Skip to content
  • Luker's avatar
    RFC6330 conformity · 714185d6
    Luker authored
    We were doing really bad stuff.
    * we were not using the correct block size, but instead
      creating something completely out-of standard
      This surely means that we were not compatible with
      OpenRQ (Ticket #20), and possibly a reason for which
      decoding fails too ofter (Ticket #21).
    * We used the wrong ESI number, which should skip
      the padding numbers (#23, #20
    
    )
    * we did not expose the real block size to the user
      of the RFC namespace (RFC iterators)
    
    Signed-off-by: default avatarLuca Fulchir <luker@fenrirproject.org>
    714185d6